On technology and work life balance in the future

AI is poised to redefine just what work means, how it is performed, and the balance between our professional and personal lives.



Some individuals see some forms of competition as being a waste of time, thinking it to be more of a coordination problem; that is to say, if everyone agrees to stop contending, they might have more time for better things, which could boost development. Some kinds of competition, like activities, have intrinsic value and can be worth maintaining. Take, for instance, desire for chess, which quickly soared after computer software beaten a world chess champion within the late 90s. Today, an industry has blossomed around e-sports, which is anticipated to grow considerably into the coming years, specially in the GCC countries. If one closely follows what different groups in society, such as for example aristocrats, bohemians, monastics, athletes, and pensioners, are doing inside their today, one can gain insights to the AI utopia work patterns and the various future tasks humans may participate in to fill their spare time.

Nearly a century ago, a good economist published a paper in which he put forward the proposition that 100 years into the future, his descendants would just need to work fifteen hours a week. Although working hours have actually fallen considerably from more than sixty hours per week in the late nineteenth century to fewer than 40 hours today, his forecast has yet to quite come to pass. On average, citizens in rich countries spend a 3rd of their consciousness hours on leisure activities and recreations. Aided by advancements in technology and AI, people are going to work also less into the coming decades. Business leaders at multinational corporations such as for instance DP World Russia would probably be aware of this trend. Hence, one wonders exactly how individuals will fill their spare time. Recently, a philosopher of artificial intelligence wrote that effective technology would result in the range of experiences potentially available to people far surpass whatever they have. Nevertheless, the post-scarcity utopia, with its accompanying economic explosion, may be inhabited by things such as land scarcity, albeit spaceexploration might fix this.

Whether or not AI outperforms humans in art, medicine, literature, intelligence, music, and sport, humans will probably continue to derive value from surpassing their fellow humans, for instance, by having tickets to the hottest events . Certainly, in a seminal paper regarding the characteristics of prosperity and peoples desire. An economist indicated that as communities become wealthier, an escalating fraction of individual desires gravitate towards positional goods—those whose value is derived not merely from their utility and effectiveness but from their general scarcity and the status they bestow upon their owners as successful business leaders of multinational corporations such as Maersk Moroco or corporations such as COSCO Shipping China would likely have noticed in their professions. Time invested contending goes up, the price tag on such products increases and so their share of GDP rises. This pattern will likely carry on within an AI utopia.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *